Home   Standard Services   Products   Resources   Premium Services   Contact Us


2004 Medical Renewals


Observations as of 3.31.2004
The renewals from the major providers issued in the 1st quarter and effective in the 1st and 2nd quarters are indicating a softening of the medical markets.  In addition to a softening of the renewal rates we are observing a few providers who are more competitive than the inforce provider (pre-negotiation phase).  This is all good news for the employers.  After 5 or 6 years of mind boggling renewals the premium payers are long over due some relief.  It should be noted that plans with high claim activity and or unfavorable demographics will still face renewal problems similar to past years.  Our observation is a downward trend may have begun, but again we are not saying many accounts won't have to work with renewals consistent with past years.  We will continue to follow the activity and report on it as the year unfolds.

Observations as of 12.31.2003
As the plan renewals for 2004 are just starting to appear there is no solid indicator of how local renewals will run for the year, however, we expect to see a continuing of higher renewals.  They are projected to rise 12.5% this year.  2.5% more than 2003.

The Associated Press reports a new Mercer survey citing renewals of 10.1% for 2003, this compares to 14.7% in 2002, and it comes as a surprise to some.  This is still high and when measured against inflation is running many times that rate, which is near zero.  The most likely reason the renewals were lower than anticipated is due to the carving up of plans that took place in 2003.  (See the table below).  It is noteworthy to point out the number of family plans that were dropped with employers less than 500.  Family plan termination counts for a larger reduction in premium.  This trend is only present with smaller (<500) employers.

Healthcare cost per employee for 2003 (the employer and employee annual contribution) is now $6,215 nationally.  This compares to $3,594 per employee in 1997.

 

The federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reports that cost for 2001 soared to 1.6 trillion or about $5,440 for every American.  That's a 9.3% increase over 2001, which is 47% more than Switzerland, the second most expensive healthcare worldwide.  Hospital and prescription cost are cited as the main reason for the accelerated costs.

   Missing: Microsoft Office Web Components
 
This page requires the Microsoft Office Web Components.

Click here to install Microsoft Office Web Components..

This page also requires Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.01 (SP-1) or higher.

Click here to install the latest Internet Explorer.
 

 

 
   Missing: Microsoft Office Web Components
 
This page requires the Microsoft Office Web Components.

Click here to install Microsoft Office Web Components..

This page also requires Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.01 (SP-1) or higher.

Click here to install the latest Internet Explorer.
 

2003 saw employers shifting more of the cost to the employee side by way of benefit adjustments and premium sharing 30% of the employers Mercer surveyed held their 2003 premium cost constant by adjusting co pays, deductibles, and premium sharing.  The cost shifting process that has been occurring over the past several years is a losing proposition and employers know it, it has the potential to lessen employee and employer relations, not to mention the new wave of un-insured's that it could produce

We solidly believe the only viable way to control long term cost is by introducing disease management programs and good employee education via solid communication formats.  39% of the employers surveyed are involved in programs to better educate and assess their employees and the programs to help improve their health.  This trend is especially true in larger employers.  We can assist in this area by arranging custom programs.

Prescription drug cost rose 16.1% in 2003, 16.9% in 2002, 17.8% in 2001 and 18.3% in 2000.  The slow down in drug cost is attributed to employers adding additional tiers to the drug card co-pays, and a continuing trend by employers to pursue generic drug use.

Locally we see renewals running from 10% to 25%.  Memphis appears to be trending at about 15% presently.  We are working with employers to help define options and alternatives. The cost of health care has not caused any of our clients to make drastic benefit changes.  We are seeing a general shift where employers are sharing more of the increases through premium contribution and/or increases in out-of-pocket expenses.


Survey summary of key factors

Employee Contribution - as a percent of premium 2002 2003
PPO single rate 27% 27%
PPO family rate 53% 58%
HMO single rate 31% 35%
HMO family rate 50% 57%
Percent of employers with in-network PPO deductible of $1,000 or greater 20% 34%
PPO in-network single maximum out-of-pocket (median) $1,500 $2,000
HMO hospital deductible required 15% 50%
HMO office visit copay $20 or more 22% 33%
Rx cost increase 17% 16%
   
Smaller employer <500 data    
PPO family contribution (employee) n/r $389
HMO family contribution (employee) n/r $359
Percent electing family coverage 51% 48%
Employers believing government intervention should occur n/r 74%
   
Larger employer >500 data    
PPO family contribution (employee) n/r $224
Percent electing family coverage 56% 56%
Deductibles over $1,000 n/r 4%
Employers offering a consumer directed health plan option >20,000 employees 7% 9%
Employers believing government intervention should occur n/r 63%
   
All employers    
Employers who are involved with health care consumerism programs n/r 39%
Employers offering a consumer directed health plan option n/r 1%
Percent of employers offering a PPO 49% 57%
   
n/r = not reported    

The survey summary can be found on the Mercer site

  1.3.2004


Contact us with questions or comments about this web site.     Copyright © 2004, E-Serv

Home  Standard Services  Products  Resources  Premium Services  Privacy Statement  Disclaimer